Diet Guru could not be happy to hear about the results of a new study convincingly. It seems no matter what you choose dieting - low fat, low carbohydrate or protein.
What is important is to reduce the number of calories you consume each day and stick to it.
With increasingly high rates of obesity and associated health risks, many people around the world have turned to diets that promote one nutrient over another; fashions and gadgets that promise results but offer little hope for lasting weight loss.
Interestingly, while previous research has shown both low carb and low fat to be effective, the latter found a job most basic rule is true - weight loss comes down to calories in verses calories burned out every day.
Consume fewer calories than you burn and you will lose weight.
"The hidden secret is that no matter if you focus on low-fat or low-carb," said Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funded the research.
The study was published in February 26, 2009 New England Journal of Medicine (with accompanying editorial) and involved a team led by the School of Public Health and Pennington Biomedical Research Center at Harvard.
The highly experienced researchers food group were looking to see what weight loss plan, all variants of the most popular options out there today, was more effective in the long term - beyond the tip of a year.
The team tried to obtain reliable and timely data to support the effectiveness of a plan on the other.
Subjects in the study, 811 overweight adults were randomly assigned to one of four diet plans.
Each plan offers fats, proteins and carbohydrates in different amounts, allowing subjects healthy fats, lots of whole grains, fruits and vegetables in addition to being low in cholesterol so that each plan guidelines Cardiovascular met .
Participants were told to cut 750 calories a day from your diet, exercising half an hour per week, keeping an online journal of what they ate, and meet regularly with advisers regime.
The result? No diet was distinguished from the others.
Reductions in weight and waist circumference were similar in the four diet groups, subjects lost 13 pounds on average in the six-month mark. All diet groups had their weight creep back after one year.
In two years, the average weight was lost about 9 pounds; reducing the size of the maintained at about 2 inches belt. Only 15% of the diet of the study weight loss of 10% or more by weight began.
It is also important to note that subjects who had regular consultations outperformed.
People who attended most of the meetings lost more weight than those who did not. This is a big difference too - attending meetings lost 22 pounds, 9 participants against less involved.
This suggests that beyond food diet to follow; behavioral elements can play an important role in weight loss.
The trick is to find a healthy diet containing foods that taste good, and you can really go all the time every day and day, at home and on vacation.
A hypocaloric diet gives people more options than they can eat, as long as the number of calories that remains below the total of the day.
The problem with many diet plans is that people have trouble getting with them.
Sure cutting carbs can work for a while, searching for your fat or protein can all be helpful, but in the end simply can not eat that way in the long term.
This study lasted two years, participants had trouble staying with a unique approach to eating for so long.
This is worrying. These themes have been carefully selected, well-mannered and enthusiastic.
"Even these highly motivated, intelligent participants who were coached by expert professionals could not achieve the weight losses needed to reverse the obesity epidemic," Martijn Katan of the Free University of Amsterdam, wrote in a editorial accompanying the study.
The message from this research is that you do not need fancy diets to lose weight. Reliable support, constant effort and common sense are the way to lasting weight loss.
What is important is to reduce the number of calories you consume each day and stick to it.
With increasingly high rates of obesity and associated health risks, many people around the world have turned to diets that promote one nutrient over another; fashions and gadgets that promise results but offer little hope for lasting weight loss.
Interestingly, while previous research has shown both low carb and low fat to be effective, the latter found a job most basic rule is true - weight loss comes down to calories in verses calories burned out every day.
Consume fewer calories than you burn and you will lose weight.
"The hidden secret is that no matter if you focus on low-fat or low-carb," said Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funded the research.
The study was published in February 26, 2009 New England Journal of Medicine (with accompanying editorial) and involved a team led by the School of Public Health and Pennington Biomedical Research Center at Harvard.
The highly experienced researchers food group were looking to see what weight loss plan, all variants of the most popular options out there today, was more effective in the long term - beyond the tip of a year.
The team tried to obtain reliable and timely data to support the effectiveness of a plan on the other.
Subjects in the study, 811 overweight adults were randomly assigned to one of four diet plans.
Each plan offers fats, proteins and carbohydrates in different amounts, allowing subjects healthy fats, lots of whole grains, fruits and vegetables in addition to being low in cholesterol so that each plan guidelines Cardiovascular met .
Participants were told to cut 750 calories a day from your diet, exercising half an hour per week, keeping an online journal of what they ate, and meet regularly with advisers regime.
The result? No diet was distinguished from the others.
Reductions in weight and waist circumference were similar in the four diet groups, subjects lost 13 pounds on average in the six-month mark. All diet groups had their weight creep back after one year.
In two years, the average weight was lost about 9 pounds; reducing the size of the maintained at about 2 inches belt. Only 15% of the diet of the study weight loss of 10% or more by weight began.
It is also important to note that subjects who had regular consultations outperformed.
People who attended most of the meetings lost more weight than those who did not. This is a big difference too - attending meetings lost 22 pounds, 9 participants against less involved.
This suggests that beyond food diet to follow; behavioral elements can play an important role in weight loss.
The trick is to find a healthy diet containing foods that taste good, and you can really go all the time every day and day, at home and on vacation.
A hypocaloric diet gives people more options than they can eat, as long as the number of calories that remains below the total of the day.
The problem with many diet plans is that people have trouble getting with them.
Sure cutting carbs can work for a while, searching for your fat or protein can all be helpful, but in the end simply can not eat that way in the long term.
This study lasted two years, participants had trouble staying with a unique approach to eating for so long.
This is worrying. These themes have been carefully selected, well-mannered and enthusiastic.
"Even these highly motivated, intelligent participants who were coached by expert professionals could not achieve the weight losses needed to reverse the obesity epidemic," Martijn Katan of the Free University of Amsterdam, wrote in a editorial accompanying the study.
The message from this research is that you do not need fancy diets to lose weight. Reliable support, constant effort and common sense are the way to lasting weight loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment